Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
小时候看的迷迷糊糊，只记得最后那句电报，永别了，同志们，我想念你们。现在看来，这句话依旧让人动容。
李侠的原型李白，其经历和电影表现的基本上一样，只有一个小小的不同：他在最后一次发报并没有说那句“同志们，永别了，我想念你们”而只是在一次较长的间隔后，连续发送了几个“本台停止发报”的信号。复制于B站评论。
①无论是学校里的李白雕像，或者是我作为第一届李白团支部的成员，李白始终是作为抽象符号出现，电影也不能避免，反而是兰芬这个角色，真正完成了某种形象的塑造。②彩色修复仍有瑕疵，比如把黑白照片都修复成彩色了。不过结局牺牲的画面由彩色转为黑白，挺好的表达方式。（2021-12-29）
央视频4K修复的彩色电影，非常喜欢，一个是对修复工作者表达敬意，另外是感受到了爷爷奶奶那个时代对党忠诚的精神，跨越时代的体验。
海报还以为是黎明，还在想，这片儿挺老的啊……
结尾与长津湖开头前后呼应，大泪点！
在微博的历史bot上看到的故事，深受震撼，原来早已有电影。人物表演可以说相当脸谱化，但那个时期的电影都这个风格，好几个镜头转场时我都想到，如果是60年代的好莱坞电影估计也拍得差不多。英雄的牛逼全靠敌人衬托，姚伟说“点划清晰，间隔分明，好像一汪清水”，女特务说“共产党知道得好详细、好生动哇”，配合戏剧化的表演，隐隐好笑。结尾收得干脆利落又感人至深：“永别了，朋友们，我想念你们”。新中国的建立经历了太多流血，向牺牲奉献的英烈们致敬。
另外不管烈士形象被塑造得多么伟光正，永远希望不要再有战争了。。。
八一电影制片厂1958年出品，AI上色技术与传统修复手法相结合，16万帧黑白影像逐帧修复。
当我访问过李白故居的时候，再回来看这部永不消逝的电波电影的时候，对于我们的地下电报工作者的充满了崇敬，片头曲延安颂和宝塔山，又来到上海，真是穿越，孙道临真帅。
永远缅怀李白烈士；电报声的运用串联了银幕里的空间，其他表现手法其实中规中矩，但是李侠的人物形象是稳定的，也许也是因为他符合人们心中对共产主义革命者的想象。
片中孙道临同志的表演真好，眼神中写满了对革命的热爱和信心。每次发报大汗淋漓，但丝毫不绝疲惫。没有想到这部电影一直从三十年代延伸到49年，最后李侠同志牺牲的时候，拼命发出最后的电报，瞬间泪目了。
大概是因为上一部给了友情分，这一部真的给不下去。巧合太多，情节刻意。
2015-06-15，王心刚？。。。没认出来T_T
爷爷是从那个年代过来的人，他一边看一边掉眼泪。
我对老电影有种特别的感情。当时觉得特好看，现在竟想不起完整的剧情了。
这种片子逻辑都是不能推敲的，片子的场景没有表现出这个桥没了，美军就不能撤退的感觉，没有看出来特别重要，只有文字对话不断强调。太多的战争大场面，缺乏叙事和人物精神内核的刻画。
电影时间1949年，看着李侠在敌人包围下镇定从容的发出最后的电报内容“同志们，永别了，我想念你们”，不禁泪目，李侠倒在了黎明前……
在那个不玩特技的年代，讲故事的方式是值得现在很多导演学习的
2.姚苇对李侠有微妙的情感，基本可解释全片最大的bug
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
