Middle class student Bob Letellier enters a new world when he meets Alain, a free-thinking rebel who, along with his group of young Parisians, has opted for a life of instant gratification instead of work and commitment. At a party, Bob meets a young woman, Mic, who appears to be just as carefree and cynical as Alain. Mic's only dream is to own a luxury car, and with Bob's help, she manages to find the money to but it. Mic's friend Clo discovers she is pregnant and, not knowing who the father is, she asks Bob to marry her. When they next meet at a party, Bob and Mic deny that they have any feelings for one another - a declaration that soon leads to tragedy...
Marcel Carné is widely regarded as one of the standard bearers of French quality cinema of the 1930s and 1940s, responsible for such masterpieces as Quai des brumes (1938) and Les Enfants du Paradis (1945). How ironic then that, in 1958, towards the end of his film-making career, he should make a film which dared to portray the attitudes and behaviour of the 1950s youth, in a way that effectively captures the mood and sentiment of the time.
Les Tricheurs was a hugely controversial film, not least because of its blatant depiction of adolescent free-love, and was even banned in some regions of France. It also received some intensely unfavourable reviews, most notably from the young hotheads on the Cahiers du cinéma such as François Truffaut who cited this film as a prime example of the decline of French cinema into mediocrity. In spite of all this negative press, the film proved to be an astonishing commercial success, attracting five million cinema-goers, and was awarded the Grand Prix du Cinéma français in 1958.
Whilst Les Tricheurs is not as flawless as Carné's earlier masterpieces, it is nonetheless a significant work, having the power to both shock and move its audience, whilst having great entertainment value. It evokes the mood of its time in a way that few French films of this period did, depicting young people as pleasure-seeking rebels, rejecting the austerity and discipline of the previous generation whilst pursuing a life without cares, responsibilities or love. Similarities with James Dean's films of the 1950s (most notably Rebel without a Cause) are apparent, although Carné's treatment of young people is far more abstract - in his film they merely symbolise a world that has lost its way, more or less victims of post-war prosperity. Although the young people in Les Tricheurs lack the authenticity to be totally credible, the film does make an important, and indeed quite disturbing point, about where the permissive society may be heading.
Much of the pleasure of the film is in the performances from its four lead actors, Jacques Charrier, Pascale Petit, Laurent Terzieff and Andréa Parisy, although only Terzieff is really convincing in his role. Marcel Carné originally considered Alain Delon and Jean-Paul Belmondo for the parts of Bob and Alain respectively, before opting for Charrier and Terzieff. As a consolation, Carné offered Belmondo a smaller part in the film - alas too small for the actor to be noticed by the public. Belmondo's breakthrough had to wait until the following year when he starred in Jean-Luc Godard's revolutionary A bout de souffle, a film which offers a very different perspective of the youth generation.
观感为什么这么像NWR...叙事高度概念化，空间高度场景化，最后形成的表达是高度寓言化的，在一个社会构架和人的身体皆是支离破碎的境况中，唯有艺术和审美还在支持着现代性文化的框架，恰巧印证了本雅明废墟-寓言的结构。而柯南伯格，在最后用自觉进化者的眼泪，宣告了某种弥赛亚降临。一次没有加以论证的自我重复和升华。
虽然有我老婆主演，但是依旧不妨碍这是个垃圾
看不懂但大受震撼系列。原本看到“大卫·柯南伯格·新器官·切割·行为艺术”等字样时兴奋不已，以为将是一场充满动感·重口味的视觉之旅，可观看时昏昏欲睡是怎么回事？镜头简洁克制极少拍越肩关系视听冷静到“无聊”是怎么回事？是刻意反漫威的实验探索吗？不懂·懵逼…直到看到豆友们的影评才知道自己多么肤浅，智商不够不要紧，别看不懂就骂，还是要多加学习才行啊！#说了什么又什么没说的影评啊#
同样是body horror 这部没有钛那么引起不适 可能是因为surgery is the new sex的理念 所有血淋淋的手术场面都充满了x张力 这不是在切割器官 这是在doi 这是艺术 这是人类思想与审美的前沿 当然这与Viggo和蕾老师的精彩表演有很大的关系 两人在里面so hot
body is reality. body is politics.
身体即现实，现实即电影。
的，因此这种学说必然会把社会分成两部分。
蕾老师和K老师都拿捏。
很想知道贺建奎的基因剪辑宝宝们现如今到底怎么样了！？片子让我很困扰的一点是，维果，一个在木兰花“催产床“控制下时不时长出奇怪器官的人，怎么能声称Lang（一具被改造过的躯体）“发明”了一个拥有自然生成的塑料消化系统的孩童是一个疯狂的想法？？？casting太不可🈲，本来就很干很单薄的幽默全被这些so called star拖累
虽然知道概念高级，但重口味的场景充斥整部电影，让人恶心了很久，然后发现它絮絮叨叨地说半天，并没有说出真正有趣的点，脑海里全是奇情画面，真的好吗？
身体即现实，现实即电影。
body fetish and the new form of sex.
但是，这是柯南伯格呀，就已足矣。
求求小k别再演戏了😭
听不懂，看不懂，
节奏着急，快进看了10分钟弃片，10分钟给我的感受是导演长期缺资金却有拍大片向往。 6.4/6617 短评3347条 %36/40/24 【IMDb 6.1/8200 北美票房254.28万美元，全球票房325.63万美元 】
67/100。探讨人类进化问题深入，主题深刻。叙事过于平缓且杂乱。部分人物形象单一，工具化严重。
基本上是柯南伯格作为艺术家的自画像，理清了他的创世架构，也就大概能理解导演想说什么，最后一滴泪是艺术家的受难也是救赎
真变态，这样的人类，能消失吗？他们存在的意义是什么啊，恶心。没了痛感，不会感染，然后还有人长的一身耳朵，拿做手术，摘除自己身体里长的其他新增的器官，就和做爱一样享受了，靠，，，身体上的各种伤口就是他们的新的性器官，这，，所以，最终想说的是，人类通过改造自己的身体，有了吃塑料的能力，然后还遗传给了自己的下一代，成了天生能吃塑料的人，这是好事呀，让这样的人类多些，去消化地球消化不了的垃圾吧。还有一个部门专门打击这样的变异人，叫新罪行部。电影看不懂，不过给的不少，女主的胸真不小呀，还有那两个到处杀人的新器官的女的，也迫不及待的脱光光躺到那个解剖仪器上。不过没看到那个注册部的小女人露，有点遗憾。男主坐在奇怪的椅子上，吃不下食物，最后开始尝试塑料食物，他吞咽困难的毛病消失了，露出了满意的笑容，，，
未来人类生理追随技术的进步，不再感受疼痛。快感的阈值不断攀升，需要靠手术才能满足。女一女二被男主吸引，不像是艺术上的共鸣，更像慕––残。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
