A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
不错的舞台剧电影，裁缝铺即是全部舞台，外部的信息要靠台词。Mark Rylance的演出以及巧妙的剪辑加分，让这个故事流畅的讲下来，当然就是太流畅了，一些巧合即所谓的剧本设计感就重了，必要的铺垫有但还不太够，也免不了让部分角色降智。
喜忧参半。结构很好，甚至舞台剧可以沿用。裁缝的故事总是有很多，他们总是身兼数职，可以是特工、可以是情报员、可以是黑帮。无论潜藏着怎样的城府，也不及那身上的一件西装！创作的很高级，却仍旧感觉意思不大，也许我不喜欢这样的类型吧。看着很累，好似不能错过任何一句台词一般，结束后一回味，就那么回事吧！
但愿电影市场能够恢复正常吧。
在封闭空间，仅用台词和表演和三五个人就拍出了一部黑帮犯罪悬疑片，节奏非常好，用戏剧小成本的方式演绎出警匪几方势力博弈、背叛、勾结、牵制的潜在戏码，而这些统统用“嘴”表现出来，文本的胜利。
戾气少了一些，励志多了一些。
从头到尾就没出裁缝店，但却拍出了满城风雨和江湖恩怨。故事充满张力，细节和反转算不上绝妙但也非常巧妙，老爷子的台词和表演扣人心魄。将一场黑帮的血腥厮杀，拍出了优雅的古典英伦风。
大体上很精彩，不用太多场面，却表现如此紧张扣人心弦的情节，厉害！不过磁带的部分，没有厘清，但还好不影响大情节。
这场对人性的纪念是近年来悬疑片第一次表达出一股精致的绅士风度。而这表达尊严的方式，在喊出从头开始时候完成。他们只是用尊严的方式表达着对一位有尊严的人的敬意。
精彩啊，Mark Rylance的掌控力太强了，神演技。非常精彩的室内戏和文戏，时长也把握的很克制。你大爷永远是你大爷。
高潮戏，我也屏住了呼吸，希望不要落下
对于一个“计划”来说，毫无周密性可言
看着眼熟，应该是头号玩家里那个游戏公司创始人，男主角演技太强了，演技感觉像天神下凡，这他妈是掌控。和沉默的羔羊里安东尼霍普金斯一个级别的。想要补看他的作品了
一个人的成才，背后一定是遇到了无数可以温暖到他的人。深见千三郎是北野武的师傅，更是他的老父亲般的人，正是因为他的引导、帮助，北野武才成了今天的北野武，才会有了花火、菊次郎的夏天……才会有了浅草小子
Well……你坐在桌子旁，摆开你的工具，然后再次开始。”
牛仔裤这样的时髦不会成为经典
精巧舞台风。剪裁得体，严丝合缝，不过也就挣个面子。
腔调很好，好到手松可以打五星，也是罕见的我不会倍速的影片。反转没那么精彩，但想要金盆洗手却永远无法成功的人设是我所喜欢的，还让人恍惚间回到了港片时代。
一切全靠“命”与“概率”
像套装一样精致又刻意hhh 总之没有一个裁缝是好惹的懂了吗！
我有预感这部电影将会被国内翻拍，或者改成舞台剧全国巡演……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
