Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
迪奇相当于东尼的师傅走的有点可惜
觉得有两幕还是挺有趣的，一处是婴儿 Chris见到Tony号啕大哭；另一段是Jonny在车上向滔滔不绝的Livia开枪。除此之外确实比较乏善可陈。
【3.5】前期讲的很破碎，最后能串联起来是不错，不过我不喜欢那种都是巧合的集合体，结局还不错，我7这部表现不错！
夙凰変成鳩，三万假市的兜兜装装。一-幵始人物太せ朶碎，呈然最后串達起来了有点思路微妙的感党，但半竟前面的故事垪得不咋地。
没啥意思，有些时候讲话怪里怪气我没文化听不太懂，但下面打算开始看剧
本来以为是雪山救人，结果从雪山上带着一个神志不清的人走下来不过占了全片篇幅的五分之一而已。本身还掉进雪洞里半天才爬出来的女主，从风雪肆虐的山上就这样带着一个腿摔伤了的男人平安回到山脚下，实在有点轻描淡写了。一看是根据文章改编，不是“根据真实事件改编”，似乎让我明白了什么。反正没有那种探险类，绝境救援类电影的惊心动魄就是了。
没有看剧集可能Get不到很多，感觉主线不是很明显。
挺一般的，故事看似衔接但挺无聊的，nanase造型不错
有没有人和我一样一脸懵逼？现实和小说傻傻分不清楚。我家的土屋妹纸身材真浓缩
作为一部电视连续剧的前传，要在短短的一部电影中，既要讲述自己的故事，还得考虑到与电视剧情节的连接，同时导演又有些心大，要紧扣当时的时代背景，自然难度是很大的。此片前面拍得很散乱，缺乏连贯的情节，只是不同场景的拼图，不停地引入人物。同时又采取了多视角的叙述方式，整体上没有兴奋点。后面半部则好得多，故事开始流畅起来，也有了一个个高潮。
不算难看哎，故事挺不错的（小朋友拿错改成别的诡计可能会更好。）感觉导演想法稍微有些….平淡了，人物其实都蛮有趣的但塑造的好薄。就是吃了一碗好吃的拉面，预料之中的味道的感觉
分了几次间歇性地看完了，不知道能不能说明些什么···
似乎解答了到底是谁杀了Uncle Dickie这个问题，大概率是Jr，但是其实谁杀了他又重要吗？假如jr没有杀他，黑人黑帮也会去杀他，和Tony最后的结局似乎一样具有了讽刺的色彩，人在做天在看，最后报应依然会找到头上。
觉得有两幕还是挺有趣的，一处是婴儿 Chris见到Tony号啕大哭；另一段是Jonny在车上向滔滔不绝的Livia开枪。除此之外确实比较乏善可陈。
假小说变成真故事，日本的刺杀小说家？开头还有点意思，后面有点不在状态，瞎了好创意。
根據真實故事改編；
快进吧，徒步总会有这种意外。但是每次的精神享受也是其他无法比拟的，没去当驴友的人体会不了，可能是为了放空，猎险，突破自我极限，但是，自己为自己行为买单就好了。
有没有人和我一样一脸懵逼？现实和小说傻傻分不清楚。我家的土屋妹纸身材真浓缩
不怎么好看的故事，日本剧情片拍得太长是通病~
一股子伊坂幸太郎味，还是状态很一般时候的伊坂，「拍手することで妖精が死なないのなら、俺もちょっと救われるかもしれない。今度どうしようもなくなった時は俺も手を叩くよ。」，这可太像伊坂式乐观主义了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
